| 

Pornography and the T.O.B
Written by Mark Houck   
Saturday, 01 August 2009

The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) says, “Sexuality affects all aspects of the human person” (n. 2332). If our sexuality truly affects all aspects of our person, then it is easy to conclude that the “partial truths” of pornography, would pervert the nuptial union of a husband and wife (Theology of the Body, p. 88). Karol Wojtyla says in his book Love and Responsibility, “problems with sex are above all problems with the ‘body’” (p. 18). The multi-billion dollar industry of pornography has created a plethora of problems with sex because it has disordered man’s view of the body. Pornography has created turmoil in marriages and deeply wounded many men and women because of the lies which the simulated sexual acts depict.

Pope John Paul II’s response to this lie is the Theology of the Body. This theology gives all of us, who are the suffering survivors of the sexual revolution, hope. The Vicar of Christ has untwisted the lies of a generation by revealing the truth behind God’s original plan for our sexuality.

Just as Christ had to remind the Pharisees “that the Creator from the beginning made them male and female” (Matthew 19: 4), so too must we remember this truth. Pope John Paul II tells us that “the fundamental fact of human existence at every stage of its history is that God ‘created them male and female’ (TOB, p. 74). Man and woman were created for marriage and “in the mystery of [this] creation, man and woman [become] a mutual gift” (p. 75). Pornography and more specifically masturbation, represents a privation of the gift and therefore the exact “opposite of this ‘welcoming’ or ‘acceptance’ of the other human being as a gift” (p. 70).

In its truest form, the conjugal act should always reflect the “reciprocal ‘acceptance’ of the other” (p. 70). Pornography perverts the conjugal act because it reduces the mutual self donation of husband and wife to an object of lust. Pornography trains a spouse to look at his or her spouse as an object for their pleasure only. In other words, the conjugal act becomes an act of using and as a result spouses use one another for their own selfish objectives.
In his book Love and Responsibility, Wojtyla says “a person must not be merely the means to an end for another person” (p. 25). In all relationships, the means must
serve both the end and the subject (p. 24). Pornography perverts the marital act because it does not allow for the ethical and mutual self donation of the married couple. The sexual acts and intimacy between a husband and wife reflect “more an object of determined techniques” rather than beautiful acts of self giving.

Wojtyla warns husbands and wives against perverting the conjugal act when he says, “remember that you may not treat that person as only the means to an end, as an instrument, but must allow for the fact that he or she, too, has, or at least should have, distinct personal ends” (p.28).

The Catechism also states that pornography damages the dignity of its participants (n. 2354). The Word of God teaches us the personal dignity of the human body and of sex (TOB, p. 89). The words spoken by Jesus on the Sermon on the Mount: “You have heard that is was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart” (Matthew 5:27-28). Christ’s words point to the dignity of every human person. In order to understand how pornography damages the dignity of its participants, John Paul II tells us “it is not enough to stop at the surface of human actions. It is necessary to penetrate inside” (p. 105).

“Adultery…means a breach of the unity by means of which man and woman, only as husband and wife, can unite so closely as to be ‘one flesh’” (p. 107). When a person
views pornography, whether it is in a magazine, video or on the internet, the person has breached marital unity and has committed adultery in the heart. When a man looks
lustfully at a woman, “this desire, an interior act, is expressed by means of the sense of sight” (p. 107). When we look upon another person with “looks” that reflect an interior dimension of our heart then we damage the dignity of that person. The Pope refers to the story of David and Bathsheba as an example of this behavior.

The pornography industry is the modern day version of David and Bathsheba. Just as David could not protect the child that Bathsheba bore for him, pornography is crippling a man’s ability to spiritually protect themselves, the women they love and their families.

Pornographic images reduce the person being lusted over to body parts only. There is no dignity when the human dimension is eliminated from the person. In short, the problem with pornography is not that it shows too much of the person, but that it shows far too little.

May we all pray for the ability to respect the dignity of each and every human person the way John Paul II did!
Servant of God John Paul II, pray for us.

Comments
  • Mark Lover  - Love you!
    Beautifully said Honey! I love you and I am so proud of you!
  • Anonymous  - Good Porn
    Is it possible to make a Catholic porn movie that depicts a married couple, lovingly engaged in sexual intercourse for
    the purpose of procreation?

    Is it a sin if a Catholic couple watches this video for the purpose of gaining a better
    understanding of sexual intercourse to better their chances at conception?

    I am confused. Please answer as clearly
    as possible as I have heard numerous opinions on the matter that has further confused me!

    -paulo
  • Mark Houck  - Regarding a Catholic Porn Movie
    The word "Catholic" and "Porn" cannot co-exist. To create porn that would be used to help Catholic
    couples pro-create is an example of the ends justifying the means. The good end pro-creation can never be linked to
    something that as the Catechism says "perverts the conjugal act" (n. 2354).

    Perhaps it would be helpful
    here to think of this in terms of the the Church's teaching on In Vetro Fertilzation. The Church has clearly taught
    about these methods of pro-creating. They are "morally unacceptable" (n. 2377). The act of pro-creation is
    denied its "proper perfection" when it is perfomed outside of the context of the procreative act. Although not
    a perfect analogy, the ends justifying the means are clearly obvious with this and I think it parallels your dilemma.


    Perhaps it is not as obvious to you when it comes to pornography and so maybe it should just be said that it is
    outright adultery. I don't know how a man can dissociate what he sees and avoid lusting if exposed to a so-called
    Catholic porno. Since we are visually stimulated as men, any video that exposes the marital act to a 3rd party, no
    matter how lovingly it is portrayed, is always going to be a near occasion of sin. Show me man who looks at porn or any
    intimacy portrayed on film whether R rated or x rated and I will show you a man who is tempted to lust in some way or
    another. Tempted being the operative word here. Even if he doesn't act out in an impure way, that image is now stored
    in his brain and will m...
  • Anonymous  - Evaded the question...
    I fail to see your parallel between "Catholic Porn" and in-vitro fertilization.

    You dodged the question
    rather than examining the whys.

    So let me rephrase it for you.

    WHY can't a video exist (let's not call it porn)
    that depicts a loving sexual act between a married couple with end result of procreation created as a visual educational
    tool for young Catholic married couples?

    Everyone preaches as if we should automatically know how to make love that
    "glorifies" god. And if traditional porn cannot be the teacher, and if Catholic parents who are conservative in
    nature, cannot be the teacher then where do those who seek knowledge go for guidance? Priests?
  • Brian  - Paolo
    That's an interesting question. I think what Mark's trying to point out is that Porn's function is not educational.
    There is educational material out there that can help explain the functions of intercourse that could potentially be
    morally permissible. The problem is that a man generally cannot watch a video of people having sex without getting
    aroused. That would defeat the educational purpose because now he's misusing his sexual function. Especially if it leads
    to masturbation.
  • Righteouslee  - Better your chances at conception?
    You don't need a video to better your chances for conception...I have found that all couples I know were struggling with
    this found that NFP has done the trick.
  • Sunnyjim  - Once you touch the devil....
    There is an old English expression that goes: Once you touch the Devil, you can't let go...'

    Though I am not fully
    familiar with the Greek etimology of the word, it is not hard to determine the present incarnation of the topic.

    It
    is impossible to not have this garbage in your face all the time.

    When in university in the late 1970s, as a
    sociology project, we wanted to prove how easy it was to make a porno-film; there was no intention of following through
    on production. The 'talent' was easy to get, as were the crew, money was easy to secure, the difficulty that appeared
    would be the lab for processing the film and printing the stock.

    The university got wind of this venture and dragged
    us across the carpet.
    We had to explain - and we were frightened - we ended up with "A"s but never came near to
    making that type of film again.

    Paper girls for paper tigers.
  • Ryus2  - Thank you
    Thank you Mark I am not new to the religious and sacred aspect of the body but i admit I have to do some updating about
    John Paul II's theology of the Body. If possible can I be provided with additional materials or even the whole text of
    John Paull II's beautiful article?
  • T-Dogg  - One man, one wife, one love, two lives...
    That's a line from an old Dean Martin song. Mark, when I look at my wife, correct me if I'm wrong, I should see someone
    I am here to serve; hence, my desire is not too cool off while I'm in heat, but to please her, and that is what should
    be the basis for my desire for sex.
  • Mark  - sorry for the delay
    Ryus2,

    You can go to EWTN's website and find the 229 Wednesday Papal Audiences in their entirety. Also Pauline books
    has published this in a book for us the lay faithful www. pauline.org.

    God bless,

    Mark
  • Mark  - oops
    Correction, meant to say 129 Wed Papal Audiences!!!
Your Contact Details:
Comment:
Security
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."